xAI buys X; deal values social network at $33 billion, $11B less than Musk paid.
See full article...
See full article...
Pretty sure he controls that too given Trump's arbitrary bitching about Autopens a couple weeks ago.I’m sure all the investors in Twitter felt perfectly free to say “no thanks” to this deal, considering Elon can sic the FTC, DOJ, and SEC on them. Because he controls basically the entire executive branch except Trumps executive order sharpie.
They're probably the same weird true believers that thought Tesla buying up his brother's failing solar electric company was also a good thing.Imagine being some kind of weird true believer with a stake in xAI, and today you learn that your beloved AI company is now devoting its resources to keeping Elon's drowning social media company (bought at a premium while high) above water.
Yeah like that will work for a private company. No one’s day trading X stocks. Anyone investing would be doing more due diligence.He's trying to hide the collapse of X in terms of revenue and valuation inside of his AI hype grift, it's all a shell game to keep his net worth from collapsing and make it more difficult for the loans to be called in by the banks or the Saudis over the valuation clauses.
He's getting really desperate as his avenues of new (corporate) grift dry up
Oh, I hope he didn't. And I hope that MrBoneSaw is pissed.For his sake I sure hope he cleared this with the Saudi's first.
Trump is immune…or so he believesOpenly committing fraud means Elon and Trump reasonably face prison if they lose power.
Losing power will quickly become an existential threat to them; staying in power worth almost any cost.
I'm guessing he's doing this to avoid getting margin called as Tesla stock continues to crater downwards
Well, anyone investing in xAI probably does deserve to lose their entire investment.Is that not fleecing the investors of xAI?
The AI bubble is ready to pop and xAI has produced basically nothing at all besides a bog-standard LLM, so for all intents and purposes the company is but a flaming pit for investors to throw money into.Well, anyone investing in xAI probably does deserve to lose their entire investment.
Trump did it with a publicly held casino company, so he knows Trump thinks it is a perfectly cromulent thing to do.So this is just Musk playing shell games to suck out cash from xAI while transferring the liabilities for tanking Twitter off his personal balance sheet and onto the balance sheet of an entity he can just walk away from right?
I'm confused. The report was that it was an all-stock transaction, which I took to mean investors in The Platform Formerly Known As Twitter received share(s) in Grok's Daddy. We don't know what either of these companies are "worth," only what Mush says the relationship between the two is.So Xai paid $33B for the stock and assumed $12B of debt. That means X was worth $45B, a $1B increase from when Musk bought it. Please correct the article and sub-title. See “enterprise value” for reference (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_value).
you forgot the resources stolen from Tesla to start XAI
So infuriating. Lazy appraiser relying on comps only. Entitled property and/or property with utility connections will always have a higher value.Funny you say that. We did a business deal to buy a building (to build a datacenter) and it was on three different plats of land, one of which were a lot of parking spaces we didn't need, and one was an empty lot. The plan was to build the datacenter, split the plats, and sell two.
The real-estate appraisal for the lots came in at exactly what we paid for it. We said "Wait, we underpaid for one, and there are two other lots and they have utilities and can sustain new builds so why are they worth nothing?"
Appraiser said: "Buyer bought for N$. Seller sold for N$. Therefore the comp is: the properties are worth N$."
So you can sell the car to yourself for $1M. Buyer thinks it's worth $1M. Seller thinks it's worth $1M. You would fail the arms-length transaction rule but let's say you sold it to your buddy Jim and then Jim sold it to you for $1,000,001. That might pass. Is the car worth $1M+. The banker bros say yes.
Excellent point. Value and worth and price are three different things.
Your car's price is $1M+.
Your car's value is what people are willing to pay for it.
Your car's worth is ... maybe market price (MP) or whatever method is agreed upon.
3 card montejfc I knew that but apparently the firehose of fascism the last two months powerwashed it out of my brain
for anyone else who needs a reminder: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/04/elo...hip-ai-chips-reserved-for-tesla-to-x-xai.html
I think he is also going to try and get some tax advantage from this by taking a loss on one side without reporting it as income on the other and the IRS will look the other way.So this is just Musk playing shell games to suck out cash from xAI while transferring the liabilities for tanking Twitter off his personal balance sheet and onto the balance sheet of an entity he can just walk away from right?
A lot of Musk’s companies aren’t inherently bad. They’re just run into the ground by mismanagement by Elon. Electric cars are a thing. Solar panels are a thing. Rockets are a thing. Social networks are a thing. Most other companies doing these things have been successful.They're probably the same weird true believers that thought Tesla buying up his brother's failing solar electric company was also a good thing.
NiceTranslated to EN-US:
Idiot screws up one company with another.
What a moron. Oh sorry, xMoron.
Where is The Dentist when you need him?I was always promised by Cryptonomicron that minority shareholder suits would put a stop to funny shenanigans like this. But I guess that was just science fiction.
Oh but they are inherently bad becuase they're owned by a nazi.A lot of Musk’s companies aren’t inherently bad. They’re just run into the ground by mismanagement by Elon. Electric cars are a thing. Solar panels are a thing. Rockets are a thing. Social networks are a thing. Most other companies doing these things have been successful.
I'm confused. The report was that it was an all-stock transaction, which I took to mean investors in The Platform Formerly Known As Twitter received share(s) in Grok's Daddy. We don't know what either of these companies are "worth," only what Mush says the relationship between the two is.
When a legitimate third party holder issues a filing that has a value that can be translated into something other than WishCoin, we'll know what it is worth. Absent documented bids, it's all farts. and mirrors. The real question is who holds the debt now, and what that means for Musk's Tesla collateral.
BingoHe's trying to hide the collapse of X in terms of revenue and valuation inside of his AI hype grift, it's all a shell game to keep his net worth from collapsing and make it more difficult for the loans to be called in by the banks or the Saudis over the valuation clauses.
He's getting really desperate as his avenues of new (corporate) grift dry up
https://www.agbi.com/ai/2024/12/regional-investors-rush-to-musks-6bn-xai-funding-round/We actually do have that. xAI raised $6bn in series c funding in late November that valued the company at $45bn.
Since the most recent deal valued xAI at $80bn, feel free to divide by 2.
What exactly do you mean by "imagine" ?Imagine twitterAI poisoning the world with manufactured realities posted by terrorist AI-PAC and heritage foundation scammerpreneur ameritard patriots headed by a south-african child of apartheid with a chip on his shoulder.
For our sake I hope he didn'tFor his sake I sure hope he cleared this with the Saudi's first.
That comment you replied to has the same energy as a vampire standing in front of a mirror saying, "Imagine if this could reflect what our eyes see!"What exactly do you mean by "imagine" ?
More likely they demanded it.For his sake I sure hope he cleared this with the Saudi's first.
Impact on US GDP? Will it be detrimental, as some claim?
Is that still true in 2025?nothing except spaceX has any real value, and even that only does due to govt subsidies.
Is this the same Grok that said that Musk is probably in violation of Wisconsin election law? Fun fact, Elon deleted the post less than half an hour later.
View: https://bsky.app/profile/burnseternal.bsky.social/post/3llhrmaknec2t